4 ms·
Not sure I understand. Non colluding: - Alice spends 100 on P - Bob spends 100 on Q Colluding - Alice spends 75 on P and 25 on Q for Bob - Bob spends 75 o
by timdaub 5y ago
Not sure I understand.
Non colluding:
- Alice spends 100 on P
- Bob spends 100 on Q
Colluding
- Alice spends 75 on P and 25 on Q for Bob
- Bob spends 75 on P and 25 on Q
Like this?
- derbOac 5y agoI think what's confusing is credits vs votes. It's more expensive in credits for Alice to cast the first N votes than to cast the next N. However, for Bob those "next N" are his first N. So 2N votes costs fewer credits if Alice and Bob each cast N than if Alice casts 2N. Also, Bob might end up with "leftover" credits he can't allocate to issues he cares about. So those credits might go unused in some sense.
- bo1024 5y agoYes. In your first scenario P and Q get 10 votes each. In your second they get sqrt(75) + sqrt(25) = 13 point something.