36 ms·
That's a bizarre comparison considering the prevalence of Object Oriented programming languages and the ubiquity of that style of programming.
by carpo 5y ago
That's a bizarre comparison considering the prevalence of Object Oriented programming languages and the ubiquity of that style of programming.
- Nursie 5y agoIt's no longer considered the only way though, nor are companies selling software based on how object-oriented it is. They did in the 90s. OO is now one of several styles, and we no longer have the drive for OO purity we did back then - modern languages and modern versions of languages tend to mix up paradigms and make pragmatic choices, rather than insist on OO everything being the only way.