5 ms·
"At some point, not too soon after the theft took place, that prototype was in that house." You have absolutely no proof of that. If you do please link to it.
by bugsy 15y ago
"At some point, not too soon after the theft took place, that prototype was in that house."
You have absolutely no proof of that. If you do please link to it. Statements from Apple goons aren't evidence. I could state that you are a terrorist pedophile so we should search your house for child porn and bombs. That doesn't make you one unless there is actual evidence shown to a judge in order to get a search warrant.
- technoslut 15y agoI have the same news which you are basing your own assumptions on. Apple didn't search his house for no apparent reason. Do you really believe that the GPS and cellular triangulation they were using were wrong? This is the same as Homeland Security are using to capture terrorists. I'm not arguing this on a legal basis. I will leave this up to the courts. I grew up on the streets and, while I may not have stolen something in my youth, I can tell you I would've been the guy to tell him to shut the phone off. There is this belief among many of the absolute of good and evil. Most times this is not the case. It's always complicated and not always clear. If you disagree, please explain the reason why anyone was there in the first place.
- meatsock 15y agothey had evidence pointing to a location. this does not mean the resident of the nearest house is culpable. perhaps the thief was walking by at the time. theres a lot of leeway I feel you may be overlooking.