> 1. Do NOT prevent transmission/infectivity to others Which doesn't fucking matter. No vaccines, with a single exception, provide durable sterilizing immunit

> 1. Do NOT prevent transmission/infectivity to others Which doesn't fucking matter. No vaccines, with a single exception, provide durable sterilizing immunity. COVID vaccines were never expected or intended to either. They were designed to provide protection against serious disease, and all the evidence so far points to spectacular success in this regard. > Do NOT provide long-term immunity to you This is simultaneously wrong and a misdirection based on fuzzy terminology. . If by "immunity" you mean protection against infection, then you've just repeated your first misleading point. If "long term immunity" means protection against serious disease, then the evidence so far says you're wrong. But if you're using your own special definition of "immunity" then I guess you can make whatever assertion you want. > Do NOT act without strong and possibly harmful side-effects Complete your sentence by telling us the statistical risk of an adverse reaction, and how it compares to the risk of serious long term effects from getting COVID. Then you might have a useful statement. > These are facts... No, these are twisted, dishonest re-phrasings you've made in an attempt to turn widely known and accepted limitations of the vaccines into some sort argument against vaccination in general. > Being aligned to actual science... Coming from you, this is just... funny actually.