3 ms·
If you go with static languages you are pretty much stuck with Microsoft or Oracle, both which are ahole companies who cannot be trusted. There is no sufficient
by tabtab 5y ago
If you go with static languages you are pretty much stuck with Microsoft or Oracle, both which are ahole companies who cannot be trusted. There is no sufficiently common 3rd static option, at least not tied to Big Tech.
- hiram112 5y agoOff the top of my head, there are now JDK open source builds provided by: * Oracle * Microsoft * Redhat * IBM (yes redundant with Redhat, but I believe IBM has multiple divisions providing JDKs, on top of what they got with RHEL purchase) * Amazon * Eclipse Foundation * Azul And that's just the USA. SAP (Germany) has a build. So does China's biggest company, AliBaba.
- naasking 5y agoWhat can't they be trusted to do? Certainly you can trust MS to serve their customers, and if you're a customer, well...