>your argument is equality is hard so we should give up. The argument you are responding to is that equality is hard, and explicitly racist policies make it ha

>your argument is equality is hard so we should give up. The argument you are responding to is that equality is hard, and explicitly racist policies make it harder, not easier. >We’re never gonna sit down one day and say “as of this morning we hit our equality metric, we did it everyone.” Which is to say, Facebook will have this policy of "low priority" for addressing "hateful" content directed at whites, men, and Americans in perpetuity? I genuinely don't understand your argument because on the one hand you admit this is a "soft", and largely arbitrary, metric but on the other you still claim that it's something that can even be "solved" at all (for some sufficient-yet-undefined definition of "solved").