4 ms·
People outside the NLP research community need to understand that a language model does nothing more than calculate probabilties for the next word given some co
by KhoomeiK 5y ago
People outside the NLP research community need to understand that a language model does nothing more than calculate probabilties for the next word given some context. The way it learns that probabilistic function can be quite complex, involving billions of parameters, but it's still fundamentally the same. Most of the increase in performance in recent years has come from the ability to train LMs that better generalize this probability function from huge text corpora--functions that better interleave between the datapoints it's trained on.
Humans use language with purpose, to complete tasks and communicate with others, but GPT-3 has no more goals or desires than an n-gram model from the 90s. LMs are essentially a faculty for syntactically well-formed or intuitive/system 1 language generation, but they don't seem to be much more.
- machiaweliczny 5y agoWhat if to predict next word you need to compress/understand universe in the end? AFAIK we have no clue how exactly NNs pick up/structure information. For me backprop and learning is similar to evolution thus result might be simialar. My knowledge is very limited though but I am happy to read any proofs/insights.
- KhoomeiK 5y agoThis is basically my area of research right now, compositional/symbolic representations in neural language models. I'll let you know the answer in a few months :)