3 ms·
Senators used to be representatives of the States, appointed by the States' legislatures. We should return to that. I'm ambivalent on term limits for House mem
by deltarholamda 5y ago
Senators used to be representatives of the States, appointed by the States' legislatures. We should return to that.
I'm ambivalent on term limits for House members like Pelosi, though. They are representatives for the people of the States, and as such the people they represent have the right and ability to kick them out, or not. There is also the argument that would you rather have a dog that knows where the bones are buried, or a dog that digs up the whole yard?
That said, members of Congress should have severe restrictions on investing for themselves and their immediate family. They either need to police it themselves, or there needs to be some kind of law that covers it. Not that that is going to happen, as we have the ultimate in foxes guarding the henhouse in our government these days, but it would make for a powerful populist position if anybody had the courage to push it.
- dragonwriter 5y ago> Senators used to be representatives of the States, appointed by the States' legislatures. We should return to that. That might be tolerable, right after we reduce the powers of the Senate to those of the British House of Lords, which it's original theory of representation is as outdated and inconsistent with representative democracy as, and transfer it's para-executive functions to the House.