4 ms·

Didn't check the details... how would bandwidth and responsivity compare to a regular SSH connection? Or MoSH?

• rektide 5y ago
  there's probably some extra bandwidth usage but it's using Data Channels, not streaming video. i'd love to know what a single character footprints is in ssh & in webrtc data-channels. evidently ssh is not actually that great[1]! webrtc might perhaps do better!! it is sctp/data-gram based! (personally i hope webtransport/quic eventually replaces this kinda odd/big stack) once one starts doing Terminal User Interface programs or something is streaming to the screen, i expect potential differences to get less noticeable. hoping that packets get bigger. but definitely would like to see real evidence that packets get bigger, buffered, not just more numerous. [1] http://blog.hyfather.com/blog/2013/04/18/ssh-uses-four-tcp-segments-for-each-character/ http://blog.hyfather.com/blog/2013/04/18/ssh-uses-four-tcp-s...