3 ms·
Why not... > branch from whatever branch is in prod > implement change on that branch (in this case adding a column), test > deploy to prod I realize the bu
by odonnellryan 5y ago
Why not...
> branch from whatever branch is in prod
> implement change on that branch (in this case adding a column), test
> deploy to prod
I realize the build and deployment process may be more complex than that making it hard... but it doesn't have to be.
I agree that a microservice OR even another system (a collection of services) is a good solution if you need to make quick iterative changes, and you can't do so with your current system.
- bspammer 5y agoThat workflow is exactly what I do, but it's on a small codebase rather than on a big one. The benefits of working on a small repo include: * Faster compilation (only depend on exactly the libraries you need) * Faster testing (only need to run the tests which are actually relevant) * Easier to understand for new joiners because there's just less code to sift through * Faster startup (this is probably java specific - the classloader is slooow) * No (okay, fewer) rebase wars * Easy to see what's currently being worked on because the Pull Requests tab isn't 200 long * Very fast rollbacks without needing to recompile a git revert (just hotswap the container for that particular service). You can't do this in a monolith without risking rolling back someone else's important changes.