4 ms·

A few pass-related projects are working on an age[1] backend in addition to gpg. I think gopass already has support for it. [1]: https://age-encryption.org/ ht

by yepguy 5y ago

A few pass-related projects are working on an age[1] backend in addition to gpg. I think gopass already has support for it. [1]: https://age-encryption.org/ https://age-encryption.org/

zikduruqe 5y ago
Here's one I have been playing with success. https://github.com/chrisswanda/passage https://github.com/chrisswanda/passage
tex0 5y ago
Correct. Gopass has very early age support. It fully works but the UX is not great (yet).
- pqb 5y ago
  Oh dammit. I have stopped using Gopass and rewrote pass just for that reason - missing AGE encryption. At least I have learned something new and I feel I have better UI - fuzzy finder instead of their TUI. However, big kudos to Gopass team for awesome work and really useful tool. Before I start working on next project... Do you recognize any mobile app, which could replace PasswordStore app for Android [0] but with AGE support? [0]: https://github.com/android-password-store/Android-Password-Store https://github.com/android-password-store/Android-Password-S...
  - yepguy 5y ago
    Android Password Store itself is keen to add age support[1], but I don't know of anything usable right now. You could probably use gopass in termux in the mean time. [1]: https://github.com/android-password-store/Android-Password-Store/issues/1195#issuecomment-808940598 https://github.com/android-password-store/Android-Password-S...
    - pqb 5y ago
      Oh, that's an awesome news. Thank you!
  - cobby 5y ago
    > missing AGE encryption I am just curious. What makes AGE backend better than GPG one?
    - yepguy 5y ago
      Age is much simpler to use in nearly every way, whether that's interactively (keys are just files!), in scripting, or in implementation. I'm still sticking to gpg for the foreseeable future, but between age and sequoia[1] I'm hopeful that things will soon be much easier to use. [1]: https://sequoia-pgp.org/ https://sequoia-pgp.org/
    - pqb 5y ago
      As yepguy mentioned AGE is simpler. I can also mention few things: - It works smoothly with SSH keys (generated from ssh-keygen), which are perfectly recognized by possibly any developer. - No need for external client, such as GpgWin/Kleopatra for Windows. - Embed-able in Rust[0] and Go[1] (there are libraries), no need to call `gpg --decrypt ...` from the command line. - Encrypted files by pass and keys are smaller. I guess it is thanks to ecliptic-curve encryption. [0]: https://github.com/str4d/rage https://github.com/str4d/rage [1]: https://github.com/FiloSottile/age https://github.com/FiloSottile/age

by yepguy 5y ago

A few pass-related projects are working on an age[1] backend in addition to gpg. I think gopass already has support for it. [1]: https://age-encryption.org/ https://age-encryption.org/

zikduruqe 5y ago

Here's one I have been playing with success. https://github.com/chrisswanda/passage https://github.com/chrisswanda/passage

tex0 5y ago

Correct. Gopass has very early age support. It fully works but the UX is not great (yet).

pqb 5y ago
Oh dammit. I have stopped using Gopass and rewrote pass just for that reason - missing AGE encryption. At least I have learned something new and I feel I have better UI - fuzzy finder instead of their TUI. However, big kudos to Gopass team for awesome work and really useful tool. Before I start working on next project... Do you recognize any mobile app, which could replace PasswordStore app for Android [0] but with AGE support? [0]: https://github.com/android-password-store/Android-Password-Store https://github.com/android-password-store/Android-Password-S...
- yepguy 5y ago
  Android Password Store itself is keen to add age support[1], but I don't know of anything usable right now. You could probably use gopass in termux in the mean time. [1]: https://github.com/android-password-store/Android-Password-Store/issues/1195#issuecomment-808940598 https://github.com/android-password-store/Android-Password-S...
  - pqb 5y ago
    Oh, that's an awesome news. Thank you!
- cobby 5y ago
  > missing AGE encryption I am just curious. What makes AGE backend better than GPG one?
  - yepguy 5y ago
    Age is much simpler to use in nearly every way, whether that's interactively (keys are just files!), in scripting, or in implementation. I'm still sticking to gpg for the foreseeable future, but between age and sequoia[1] I'm hopeful that things will soon be much easier to use. [1]: https://sequoia-pgp.org/ https://sequoia-pgp.org/
  - pqb 5y ago
    As yepguy mentioned AGE is simpler. I can also mention few things: - It works smoothly with SSH keys (generated from ssh-keygen), which are perfectly recognized by possibly any developer. - No need for external client, such as GpgWin/Kleopatra for Windows. - Embed-able in Rust[0] and Go[1] (there are libraries), no need to call `gpg --decrypt ...` from the command line. - Encrypted files by pass and keys are smaller. I guess it is thanks to ecliptic-curve encryption. [0]: https://github.com/str4d/rage https://github.com/str4d/rage [1]: https://github.com/FiloSottile/age https://github.com/FiloSottile/age