4 ms·
> Here, then, is the problem: People who are unlikely to be hospitalized by Omicron might still feel reasonably protected, but they can spread the virus to thos
by pezzana 5y ago
> Here, then, is the problem: People who are unlikely to be hospitalized by Omicron might still feel reasonably protected, but they can spread the virus to those who are more vulnerable, quickly enough to seriously batter an already collapsing health-care system that will then struggle to care for anyone—vaccinated, boosted, or otherwise. The collective threat is substantially greater than the individual one. And the U.S. is ill-poised to meet it.
Of all the factors at play, this one seems the least appreciated. I don't think the country or the world is ready for the implications of mass vaccination actually promoting the spread of virus. Nor is the world ready for restrictions of movement that would inevitably follow from realizing that movements of the vaccinated risks spread and the knock-on effect of pushing already stretched hospitals past capacity.
- thehappypm 5y agoThe virus is so widespread that there’s no stopping it. Vaccinating improves individual outcomes and reduces the health system burden. It doesn’t eliminate the virus, and mitigations just kick the can down the road. Omicron at least will burden hospitals less, and once Paxlovid scales up the impact to the health system will be cut another order of magnitude.
- brodouevencode 5y agoThe goal of "zero covid" is, at this point, just dumb.