I don't see how that's an issue. You can take their argument at face value, then deconstruct it and refute piecemeal. Rationalisations generally fall apart un

I don't see how that's an issue. You can take their argument at face value, then deconstruct it and refute piecemeal. Rationalisations generally fall apart under further scrutiny, and if they don't, then maybe they aren't just rationalisions after all.