3 ms·

Funny that you left out the next couple of sentences in that quote: "I’m not saying they made Aaron kill himself. Aaron might have done this anyway." But eithe

by slg 5y ago

Funny that you left out the next couple of sentences in that quote: "I’m not saying they made Aaron kill himself. Aaron might have done this anyway." But either way, what do you think the response from the legal system should be in this situation? Should "my client is a suicide risk" be a path to reduced sentencing? I think that is a huge can of worms. Authorities should certainly work to protect people in their custody to prevent suicide, but I have a hard time agreeing with the idea that they have a responsibility to be more lenient against potentially suicidal defendants.

dredmorbius 5y ago
Again: given a full warning of the problem, judge and prosecutors expressed extreme indifference. Certainly not judicious exercise of their discretion. All for a victimless crime. And rather than express some modicum of sympathy you point out the humour in the situation. (What humour, I'm not even going to begin to ask.) I couldn't disagree with you more strongly.
- deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]
- slg 5y ago
  Not funny as in humor, but definition 2 and 3 of "funny"[1]: >2: differing from the ordinary in a suspicious, perplexing, quaint, or eccentric way >3: : involving trickery or deception The overall quote agreed with me, but you removed that extra context to make it agree with you. You also did a good job of avoiding giving a definitive answer to my question because you realize your answer sets a difficult precedent. Should "my client is a suicide risk" be a path to reduced sentencing? [1] - https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/funny https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/funny
  - dredmorbius 5y ago
    You're doing an equally good job of avoiding expressing any empathy and human concern your response instead with again defending your own position and word choice. I'll offer you another opportunity with your own question: Should "my client is a suicide risk" be a path to reduced sentencing?
    - slg 5y ago
      My empathy is going to the people who are alive and suffering from similar mental health issues today that could be helped if we told the truth about why Swartz is dead. I answered the question in the first comment.

by slg 5y ago

dredmorbius 5y ago

Again: given a full warning of the problem, judge and prosecutors expressed extreme indifference. Certainly not judicious exercise of their discretion. All for a victimless crime. And rather than express some modicum of sympathy you point out the humour in the situation. (What humour, I'm not even going to begin to ask.) I couldn't disagree with you more strongly.

deleted 5y ago
[deleted]
slg 5y ago
Not funny as in humor, but definition 2 and 3 of "funny"[1]: >2: differing from the ordinary in a suspicious, perplexing, quaint, or eccentric way >3: : involving trickery or deception The overall quote agreed with me, but you removed that extra context to make it agree with you. You also did a good job of avoiding giving a definitive answer to my question because you realize your answer sets a difficult precedent. Should "my client is a suicide risk" be a path to reduced sentencing? [1] - https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/funny https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/funny
- dredmorbius 5y ago
  You're doing an equally good job of avoiding expressing any empathy and human concern your response instead with again defending your own position and word choice. I'll offer you another opportunity with your own question: Should "my client is a suicide risk" be a path to reduced sentencing?
  - slg 5y ago
    My empathy is going to the people who are alive and suffering from similar mental health issues today that could be helped if we told the truth about why Swartz is dead. I answered the question in the first comment.