4 ms·
I mean, I get what you're going for but there's a reason why nobody does this. mjpeg is just about the most inefficient thing you could possibly do. Maybe it
by VWWHFSfQ 5y ago
I mean, I get what you're going for but there's a reason why nobody does this. mjpeg is just about the most inefficient thing you could possibly do. Maybe it would be fine if the desired product experience is "make it look like an animated gif and take 40 gigabytes to store an hour of video"
edit: not trying to discourage! Just saying this is a pretty well-trodden path and mjpeg is mostly abandoned despite ubiquitous support for it