3 ms·

so you're going to playback mjpeg to people? I don't think this is going to work very well. at the very least it needs to be a shipping video in the form of a

• bob1029 5y ago
  > I don't think this is going to work very well. I've built prototypes using libjpegturbo for encoding to web clients and it works out fantastically in my experience. I don't see a requirement to ship anything remotely modern if the desired product experience is achieved regardless. No one said it always has to work on every class of device everywhere for every type of user. Maybe someone just wants something that functions in any reasonable web browser and isnt interested in directly competing with twitch.tv.
  • VWWHFSfQ 5y ago
    I mean, I get what you're going for but there's a reason why nobody does this. mjpeg is just about the most inefficient thing you could possibly do. Maybe it would be fine if the desired product experience is "make it look like an animated gif and take 40 gigabytes to store an hour of video" edit: not trying to discourage! Just saying this is a pretty well-trodden path and mjpeg is mostly abandoned despite ubiquitous support for it