3 ms·
I wonder about this, I heard same claim before. I however owned 2 of them over the last 5 years(moved a country and did not bring first one). Fact that I bought
by tlear 5y ago
I wonder about this, I heard same claim before. I however owned 2 of them over the last 5 years(moved a country and did not bring first one). Fact that I bought the second one kinda tells the story.
Honest I never had any issue with them.. maybe if you have a huge house? Or really thick carpets. I find it incredibly convenient and it works well enough, convenient means you can use it every day and do not need to get through that barrier of getting something out of the closet. I have the charging station mounted next to the fridge and honestly I will never buy another kind of vacuum.
- blitzar 5y agoIt certainly is convenient enough to use every day, but you have to. Any attempt to deeply clean a moderately sized room is going to involve considering a recharge, and certainly more work than basically any plug in. I can think of a few small flats with all laminate flooring I have lived in that it would have been great in, but the $20 small plug in thing I had worked probably just as well, and not a lot less convenient.
- seoulmetro 5y agoSeems like a conventional, more powerful and cheaper vacuum that was the same factor to fit next to the fridge would suit you better. I haven't seen a cordless vacuum that actually worked and have resorted to corded vacuums for my entire life. Vacuums should suck, they should suck a lot but Dysons don't really suck all that much (haha)
- tlear 5y agoHmm that is kinda my point for my uses it does suck more than enough ;) but then we don't have any carpets except carpeting on stairs and it's charge is more than enough for that on max power. If I had carpets in the house I think I would get corded as well. But why have carpets is a better question.