That's a very interesting proposition that looks completely insane to my European eyes, but I can certainly understand the philosophy behind it. So the premise

That's a very interesting proposition that looks completely insane to my European eyes, but I can certainly understand the philosophy behind it. So the premise is that if using kill-switches becomes common among criminals, we can expect suspects in computer crime cases to be apprehended in ways such as unexpectedly being hit in the head with blunt force trauma, gassed with anesthesics or similar violence. Seems like it would challenge some pretty central democratic principles!