4 ms·
It's the first of the links where they say "When building support for group calls, we evaluated many open source SFUs", so I suppose it's either not one of the
by Vinnl 5y ago
It's the first of the links where they say "When building support for group calls, we evaluated many open source SFUs", so I suppose it's either not one of the two with "adequate congestion control", or is the one that did not reliably scale past 8 participants?
- pthatcherg 5y agoAuthor here. Jitsi and MediaSoup both seemed to have good congestion control at the time. And, yes, as mentioned, the primary reason for writing a new one was performance/scalability.
- gfodor 5y agoCan you elaborate on the scaling issues you hit (and with which implementations?) I've used Janus + MediaSoup but not Jitsi before for WebRTC audio for web based multiplayer games.
- pthatcherg 5y agoCPU usage was so very high for calls over 5-6 participants. I'm not sure what more there is too it.
- gfodor 5y agoThanks, in Jitsi or Mediasoup or both?