3 ms·
It's pretty much identical to wrong data. One data point is nothing. It's a comprehensive mistake to give it any weight. At least for complex subjects like hea
by JoeAltmaier 5y ago
It's pretty much identical to wrong data. One data point is nothing. It's a comprehensive mistake to give it any weight.
At least for complex subjects like health, weather etc. "I saw a snowflake! Global warming has to be wrong!" is not any kind of conclusion.
- Bancakes 5y agoWhat's the alternative? "5% of crops died in a country halfway around the world, that's used to dead crops. You should buy a Tesla now." "Humans have been eating saturated fats for 2 million years but half rancid PUFA are healthier." No, I can look at and trace the proofs in any mathematical publication. I can look at and trace any open source code. If something works, I should be able to test it. And it's your flaw to assume people will play along with the onus.