3 ms·
For the last time, it was NOT an illegal search. They asked and were given permission to enter and search. Does that need repeating?
by sigzero 15y ago
For the last time, it was NOT an illegal search. They asked and were given permission to enter and search. Does that need repeating?
- RexRollman 15y agoThe gave permission for cops to search, not Apple. They knew full well that they were creating the impression that all of them were police officers.
- scarmig 15y agoGroup of people show up in plainsclothes. One knocks on your door and identifies himself as a police officer and alludes threateningly to your family's immigration status. Two of the others ask if they can enter your house. You agree to it (and they find nothing). Everything in that series of events is incredibly sketchy and falls under the heading "if it isn't illegal, it should be." And if you go by the spirit of the law, the Apple employees should definitely be charged for impersonating police officers, given this narrative of events. Note that it would still be incredibly goonish even if (a) they made sure the dude understood they were Apple employees and not police officers or (b) everyone involved actually is a police officer. Pure nastiness on the part of Apple and the SFPD.
- _debug_ 15y ago"According to Dangerfield, the officers "did not go inside the house," but stood outside while the Apple employees scoured Calderón's home, car, and computer files" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police_impersonation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police_impersonation