4 ms·
> it's not true that people are infectious just because they've been vaccinated Does anyone believe this(???). This is just crazy. I figured that the purpose o
by FooBarBizBazz 5y ago
> it's not true that people are infectious just because they've been vaccinated
Does anyone believe this(???). This is just crazy. I figured that the purpose of a quote like
> people who have received the vaccine can spread or shed the virus
is to say something like,
"The virus still spreads in a vaccinated population."
"Therefore, getting vaccinated, while it helps you, doesn't help others, and doesn't help 'end the pandemic' sooner. I.e., it doesn't lead to (vaccine-based) herd immunity."
"Therefore, you have no reason to be mad at your neighbors who refuse to get vaccinated."
I don't know if all that's actually true -- I assume that vaccinated people are at least somewhat less likely to spread COVID (nothing is ever a sure thing) -- but it's at least not crazy.
Have I been too charitable?
I don't know what to think these days. Words and phrases (e.g. "herd immunity") seem to just be trigger-words. I sometimes can't even detect logical thought. So it seems entirely possible that people are spreading these even more crazy ideas.
But I'd thought the argument was for something more plausible.
- verdverm 5y ago> I assume that vaccinated people are at least somewhat less likely to spread COVID They have a shorter shedding period and less area under the curve. There are reports that the peak is similar to unvac'd. Again it is case by case due to severity of an infection. A healthy unvac'd child will likely have a lower viral load than a vac'd elderly. Now with regards to "likelihood", that will depend on the social behavior of vac'd vs unvac'd. This still is too vague as some vac'd are cautious while others are not, and vice-a-versa.