> Your original work uses the licensed track Using samples for percussion doesn’t mean sampling other commercial tracks, nor does it mean you’re using loops.

> Your original work uses the licensed track Using samples for percussion doesn’t mean sampling other commercial tracks, nor does it mean you’re using loops. > Your work is similar to their work. > > If they were first they have a plausible copyright claim against you. > > Unless the license was copyleft. Which is a motivation for copyleft. > > The license to a drum track only protects from claims from the rightsholder of the drum track. This is 100% incorrect. There is nothing here that matches reality of copyright. The owner of the original recording that was sample owns the copyright but can license to others without losing it. If you have a legitimate license and the licenser is the legitimate copyright owner, you are in the clear. One person using it doesn’t make them the owner. The copyleft advice is also completely wrong. Copyleft in the context of music is untested in courts and wouldn’t make a iota of difference here.