4 ms·
It's interesting that west-2 was quicker to create the incident (despite the issue starting a bit later there, at least by our experience), and while they both
by JshWright 5y ago
It's interesting that west-2 was quicker to create the incident (despite the issue starting a bit later there, at least by our experience), and while they both "identified" at the same time, west-2 also waited longer to call it resolved.
I assume there are different teams responsible for each, is the west-2 team just more on top of things?
- tyingq 5y agoWest-2 also launched many years after us-east-1, so less legacy to deal with.
- vineyardmike 5y ago1.US-East-1 wasn't involved today. 2. They don't really have much "legacy" stuff to deal with since they likely turn over racks quickly across their whole fleet and software deployments should be standardized, so any US-east-1 flakiness has to do with the fact that its where amazon houses their control planes often.
- ldoughty 5y agoThere's at least one AZ in East-1 that doesn't support nitro, and that's been around for 4ish years now... I agree in principle, but clearly something is hobbling them because of (probably) legacy stuff