4 ms·
Rightly so. My point is a company can self-audit without having to pay a competitor.
by itisit 5y ago
Rightly so. My point is a company can self-audit without having to pay a competitor.
- lostlogin 5y agoAbsolutely. And even if it’s cheaper to use the competition, an expensive custom solution will be found.
- whimsicalism 5y agoI think that is inherently riskier because you never know on what axis you will have a failure and it is difficult to exclude all shared axes.
- 8note 5y agoThat applies when you use competitors too. They could have a related outage, or even a coincidentally timed one
- jethro_tell 5y agoBut we're talking about a status page which should be basically static. In it's simplest form you need a rack in 2+ random colos and a few people to manage the page update framework. Then you make teams submit the tests that are used to validate SLA. Run the tests from a few DCs and rebuild the status page every minute or two. Maybe add a CDN. This shit isn't rocket science and being able to accurately monitor your own systems from off infrastructure is the one time you should really be separate.