3 ms·

> self destructs in a reversible way Reversibility is not a feature of destruction, lexically-speaking. A better description might be "locked". More important

• dane-pgp 5y ago
  > if you are able to reverse it, you can be compelled to reverse it. An interesting way of strengthening such a system is to split the recovery code between multiple people in multiple jurisdictions. Convincing them to hand over their piece of the key could require various levels of proof-of-free-will, ranging from "Hey, I need those numbers on that piece of paper I gave you" (asked on a video call, in a public park) to "I've booked a flight and I'll meet you at the agreed place next Monday at the standard time". These approaches can be combined with a protocol of "If I use the duress phrase, then give me a fake key and then send a message to the other members of the group / the public / the media that I've been compromised". Of course this sort of system assumes you are part of a wider organisation or at least have friends you can trust to implement all this opsec securely, without adding to your risk profile, but for some people this will be viable.