> as long as primary incentives for those politicians are campaign contributions from corporations and wealthy donors I would imagine corporations funding poli

> as long as primary incentives for those politicians are campaign contributions from corporations and wealthy donors I would imagine corporations funding politicians would want their businesses not be vandalized. I get some NIMBY policies are pushed by wealthy donors w/ real estate but that should be balanced out by developers. Something deeper is wrong. It's almost as these politicians are purposely destroying the vast amount of wealth built up over the years and letting in chaos.