4 ms·
We have literally no reason to think it's an issue. The burden of proof is on those who believe its a threat, not those who believe it isn't.
by sweetheart 5y ago
We have literally no reason to think it's an issue. The burden of proof is on those who believe its a threat, not those who believe it isn't.
- zionic 5y ago"Burden of proof"? Seems like it's pretty hard to prove what intelligence agencies are doing. Also, there's the fun "you can't sue us because you have no standing/can't show harm, and showing harm to prove you have standing would be illegal".
- sweetheart 5y ago> "Burden of proof"? Yes, here you go: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)