4 ms·
>Which sites are you actually complaining about here? Every website which loads way more content than its use case justifies. If the high quality of my device
by usrbinbash 5y ago
>Which sites are you actually complaining about here?
Every website which loads way more content than its use case justifies. If the high quality of my device and ubiquitous broadband is the only reason that something appears to be loading fast, that's not good.
>Or let's pick a technical resource. go.dev's landing page? No noticeable delay in loading for me
Among other things, that's because this is a website loading what it has to, instead of everything and the kitchen sink. 885kB in total, and most of that are the images of "companies using go".
- jameshart 5y agoYes, stipulated - bad websites are bad. But I just picked a few obvious high profile information-oriented sites and none of them had that problem. So… which websites are the bad ones? Are you looking at the first site that comes up when you search for ‘chocolate chip cookie recipes’ and holding that up as an example that the web is a disaster area? That’s like picking up a gossip magazine from the rack in the supermarket checkout line and complaining that American literature has really gone to the dogs.