3 ms·
That's a category error. Ruby is not a framework.
by jhgb 5y ago
That's a category error. Ruby is not a framework.
- emteycz 5y agoDoesn't matter, almost nobody uses Ruby without Rails. And my statement holds true for any Ruby framework.
- jhgb 5y ago> my statement holds true for any Ruby framework Are you sure all Ruby frameworks use the same "path w.r.t. metaprogramming" as Rails? It's been a while since I looked at them but I recall many priding themselves in the difference back then.
- emteycz 5y agoRuby programmers still use the features, even if their framework doesn't
- jhgb 5y agoAnd you're saying that that was the reason? I'm just trying to divine the relevance of the "other frameworks that chose a different path w.r.t. metaprogramming seem to be the more popular (and growing) choice today" claim.
- emteycz 5y agoSorry, meant languages+frameworks, not just frameworks there. I was thinking of TS+React or C#+ASP.NET in that particular case.