> While dynamic languages can be the right choice for a large project, you have to make the case for why it’s the right choice, like a killer library, something

> While dynamic languages can be the right choice for a large project, you have to make the case for why it’s the right choice, like a killer library, something particular to the domain, etc. ...While dynamic languages can be the right choice for a large project, you have to make the case for why it’s the right choice, like a killer library, something particular to the domain, etc. 99% of software projects are by no definition "large". Why in the world would it follow that what is right for critical state infrastructure is at all the right way to do something not nearly as complex? An attempt at rephrasing the argument: "When you go to the moon, you need to concern yourself with the vacuum. If you're not going to the moon, you should put on your space suit because other people are going to the moon."