I don't know about Wikipedia's editors but decent meta-analyses were already showing solid results in 2014[0] and this meta-analysis of 24 RCTs this year also s

I don't know about Wikipedia's editors but decent meta-analyses were already showing solid results in 2014[0] and this meta-analysis of 24 RCTs this year also shows decent results. The NHS reasoning is that it's too expensive, not ineffective and even that seems odd to me as it's produced pretty cheaply to use for variety of purposes. I'd guess the expense is due to the patents of esketamine used to approve it for depression while being able to profit, but that seems to be the less effective type at any rate. 0. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00213-014-3664-5 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00213-014-3664-5 1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016503272032766X https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S01650...