3 ms·
in the exact case of the mona lisa, anyone could tell the difference because the real thing has noticeable texture and yours would just be a poster. maybe a be
by jayski 5y ago
in the exact case of the mona lisa, anyone could tell the difference because the real thing has noticeable texture and yours would just be a poster.
maybe a better analogy would be a famous photograph like the rhein 2
- dmarcos 5y agoYou can buy replicas that reproduce the paint texture https://www.designtoscano.com/products/mona-lisa-classic-art-reproduction-small-da1141-fam https://www.designtoscano.com/products/mona-lisa-classic-art...
- Balero 5y agoI mean you are right, but that texture is doing a lot of work, since the Mona Lisa is about $850 million, and my solution is $0.0001 million, and indistinguishable at 15 meters. But either way, this doesn't distract from the main thrust of my point. Art is expensive for Money reasons, not art reasons. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZ3F3zWiEmc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZ3F3zWiEmc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5sOuET8UWA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5sOuET8UWA
- jayski 5y agoyeah I agree, theres a lot of speculation in the art market.