3 ms·
I completely understand your point. My point is: it's false equivalency. One example of "interrupting government services" is not necessarily equivalent to anot
by the_gastropod 5y ago
I completely understand your point. My point is: it's false equivalency. One example of "interrupting government services" is not necessarily equivalent to another example of "interrupting government services". Very specifically, one of these groups was interrupting the democratic election process. That bears a hell of a lot more weight than the other examples.
- edmcnulty101 5y agoI think a real insurrection meets different criteria than 'interrupting government activities' by an unarmed, disorganized mob of protestors. Its subjective and most people's interpretation of the events predictably falls along party lines. We're arguing the semantics of 'insurrection'. I think there would not be a shadow of a doubt if a real insurrection occured. This event was closer to blocking a street sweeper than a real true insurrection.