3 ms·
https://ai-service-demos.go-aws.com/polly https://ai-service-demos.go-aws.com/polly check the neural then british, Amy. the "smoothness" is uncanny. the sample
by 2Gkashmiri 5y ago
https://ai-service-demos.go-aws.com/polly https://ai-service-demos.go-aws.com/polly
check the neural then british, Amy. the "smoothness" is uncanny. the samples are "almost" there with larynx you linked. good but take kathleen (glow_tts), there is "still" some robotic in there. is this something that can be improved by tweaking the training ? this sounds really cool to be used at home
- follower 5y agoOh, yeah, I'm definitely aware there's still a quality gap when compared to proprietary online TTS options--but I'm specifically interested in FLOSS+offline for my purposes. And Larynx is game-changingly ahead of the other FLOSS+offline options. (Probably the highest quality voice is the one that's used for the demo video narration--which when I first heard it I had to skip to the end of the video to confirm it wasn't a live human. :) ) My (mostly uninformed) impression is that there's room for training tweaking/improvement given how young the project is. And there's also multiple stages to the generation process so presumably there's opportunities at each stage.
- 2Gkashmiri 5y agoyeah, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBmhDf8cl0k https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBmhDf8cl0k at the end says southern female english https://rhasspy.github.io/larynx/#en-us_southern_english_female-glow_tts https://rhasspy.github.io/larynx/#en-us_southern_english_fem... but the sample is NOT like the video, maybe the samples are old. the video is a great example