4 ms·
GP's point was broader than log4j. It's that we're all building our own spaghetti using a collection of libraries and frameworks all built with their own spaghe
by jlmorton 5y ago
GP's point was broader than log4j. It's that we're all building our own spaghetti using a collection of libraries and frameworks all built with their own spaghetti.
By the time software gets to the SaaS end user, it's giant rope-sized spaghetti noodles knit together with spaghetti thread spun from spaghetti fibers.
- josephg 5y agoYep. As long as our capacity to build, maintain, tune and secure our systems depends on our ability to understand the entire pot of spaghetti - we're in trouble. Security is the worst because most of our systems are only secure if every single line of running code is secure. In the face of exponentially increasing system complexity, this is a race we will always inevitably lose.