5 ms·

> you should try assuming good faith > Fucking what? Just answer the question. ---- It's not an insurrection or an attack on democracy or any sensationalized

> you should try assuming good faith > Fucking what? Just answer the question. ---- It's not an insurrection or an attack on democracy or any sensationalized label you want to attach to it. I'm sorry your argument lacks any evidence other than subjectively trying to determine 'intent' and one off wingnuts whose significance is being blown out of proportion, with no hard objective facts to support this being an confirmed insurrection. If you want to believe it was an insurrection or attack on democracy and demonize your fellow citizens, despite the lack of objective evidence, go right on ahead!

ShamelessC 5y ago
For what it's worth, I was attempting to find some middle ground this _entire_ discussion and all you ever did was dig yohr heels in, persuading me of one thing - you are insecure and uninformed about your own opinions. Have a nice life.
- edmcnulty101 5y ago
  The following are all things you've said to me today, they probably violate some site guidelines, but I think collectively you can interpret them as my response to you, just substitute right leaning for left leaning. > you should try assuming good faith when you debate people here. It's in the rules first off, but it leads to better and more interesting discussion. > you are insecure and uninformed about your own opinions. >We have all gathered you are some form of right-leaning conservative at this point. No one else would be as defensive as you have been about this topic > Again, no one forced you to talk to that person >you still seem like you're a bit too frustrated to have a pleasant debate with. >Fucking what? Just answer the question > If you don't have anything constructive _and_ pleasant to say, then please wait for your mood to simmer before commenting. >Consider taking some time away from commenting - this is my go-to strategy when I'm hot-headed. > At no point did you treat the opposition with respect > I tried being reasonable but you don't want to listen to reason. >Did you at least learn something new here?

ShamelessC 5y ago

For what it's worth, I was attempting to find some middle ground this _entire_ discussion and all you ever did was dig yohr heels in, persuading me of one thing - you are insecure and uninformed about your own opinions. Have a nice life.

edmcnulty101 5y ago
The following are all things you've said to me today, they probably violate some site guidelines, but I think collectively you can interpret them as my response to you, just substitute right leaning for left leaning. > you should try assuming good faith when you debate people here. It's in the rules first off, but it leads to better and more interesting discussion. > you are insecure and uninformed about your own opinions. >We have all gathered you are some form of right-leaning conservative at this point. No one else would be as defensive as you have been about this topic > Again, no one forced you to talk to that person >you still seem like you're a bit too frustrated to have a pleasant debate with. >Fucking what? Just answer the question > If you don't have anything constructive _and_ pleasant to say, then please wait for your mood to simmer before commenting. >Consider taking some time away from commenting - this is my go-to strategy when I'm hot-headed. > At no point did you treat the opposition with respect > I tried being reasonable but you don't want to listen to reason. >Did you at least learn something new here?