> At first there wasn’t evidence that masks worked, once that had been accrued science was pro-mask. This is not how that worked. The evidence in terms of test

> At first there wasn’t evidence that masks worked, once that had been accrued science was pro-mask. This is not how that worked. The evidence in terms of tests and trials is inconclusive, either for or against masks, in terms of experimental evidence of effectiveness. Nevertheless East Asia was all fro masks from the beginning and the WHO, CDC, FDA, Surgeon General were against, very vehemently. The western establishment changed their minds based not on experimental evidence but on people going "Are you morons? You're saying masks are literally useless? Not of limited use, actually worthless? Do you understand how airflow and droplets work at all?"