3 ms·
There have been plenty of new backend approaches since the term Web 2.0 was minted. The important change was a shifting from one request per view to multiple re
by pbourke 5y ago
There have been plenty of new backend approaches since the term Web 2.0 was minted. The important change was a shifting from one request per view to multiple requests that comprise a view: it was the client/server interaction patterns that were important.
The fact that you build your “web 3” application using Web 2.0 techniques (SPAs, etc) tells me that web 3 is not a thing. It’s another type of backend, and the web is designed to have those appear in perpetuity.
- fastball 5y agoSo if you specifically craft a definition to exclude web3 from being a new paradigm for the web, it (surprisingly) is not a new paradigm for the web. Interesting and constructive.