3 ms·
> Vox wanted to update their articles. That's bad. gpm wants to aggregate coverage of the same topic over time. That's great; it gives you an easy way to look a
by fknorangesite 5y ago
> Vox wanted to update their articles. That's bad. gpm wants to aggregate coverage of the same topic over time. That's great; it gives you an easy way to look at "what did people think in 2018?".
At the risk of sounding Extremely Hacker News™, this sounds like a job for version control, ha.
- gpm 5y agoThese days "CRDTs" are all the rage for this sort of use case :P Anyways, I'm basically planning on doing this part, but linearly like wikipedia (and it's history page) not as a tree like git. Also what I'm currently doing only counts as a CRDT if "rerender the whole page in case of conflict" is a valid update strategy... https://crdt.tech/ https://crdt.tech/
- thaumasiotes 5y ago> this sounds like a job for version control Not at all. The most that would get you is "what did Vox think in 2018?".