8 ms·
Let's assume that the author actually believes that music sounds better with this hardware, and it's not paid-for review. Would it be ethical to push such pers
by aljarry 5y ago
Let's assume that the author actually believes that music sounds better with this hardware, and it's not paid-for review.
Would it be ethical to push such person through double-blind test, which (I assume) would disprove that there is a perceivable difference?
- teraflop 5y agoThe most die-hard believers will insist that if two pieces of equipment sound "obviously" different when you know which one you're listening to, but they're indistinguishable under a double-blind test, then the only explanation is that the testing methodology must be flawed. They simply find the "placebo effect" explanation absurd and refuse to accept it. https://web.archive.org/web/20090304012729/http://www.avguide.com/forums/blind-listening-tests-are-flawed-editorial https://web.archive.org/web/20090304012729/http://www.avguid...