> call something you disagree with pseudoscience You are right, this is just bullshit. It does not pretend to be a scientific study, I over interpreted what it

> call something you disagree with pseudoscience You are right, this is just bullshit. It does not pretend to be a scientific study, I over interpreted what it was saying. > There is very little that one can learn from psychology (with respect to this topic) as psychology lacks a great deal of consensus on this and most other subjects That is a reason to beware of some random opinion, assertiveness does not need to correlate with reason. That this text is assertive does not make it valuable. I see no more learning that people will categorize others in search of a simplicity that is not there. As I said, it's not insightful in any way, it just simplifies to make people feel smart and think that they understand some truth that is no there.