3 ms·
I don't think that's the most provocative thing in the comment. Frankly, this is pretty binary. She brought up two possible things that could have resulted in d
by InTheArena 5y ago
I don't think that's the most provocative thing in the comment. Frankly, this is pretty binary. She brought up two possible things that could have resulted in discipline or not. The other claims all appear to be denunciations of a political nature - or something that is objectively easy to disprove. Did SpaceX investigate the matter? Was there any discipline? Did others disagree?
- dang 5y agoIt's obviously an extraneous distraction that has zero to do with the topic. We don't need a cryptocurrency flamewar, god help us, on top of this. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- sharemywin 5y agoLet me articulate. The lead was about sexism in spacex. then there's a rant about for about half the article on SpaceX not being green. Then an NFT pitch. And YEs NFT's are currently bad for the planet. I was just pointing out if the author cares about the being green they might want to start with the article. And if the author truly cares about the lead of the article then they might want to stick to the important part. the NFT part at best distracts from the article and probably strains the authors credibility.
- seoulmetro 5y agoDon't try and use logic against dang. He doesn't understand it. He just assumes everything is bad emotions.