i see 7.8% overheads and the rest as program work which is actually pretty great for an ngo. this piece reads like someone opportunistically skimmed the annual

i see 7.8% overheads and the rest as program work which is actually pretty great for an ngo. this piece reads like someone opportunistically skimmed the annual report for provocative headlines to promote their own brand. skimming the toc for the annual report, i see loads of relevant linux support efforts that go beyond just the kernel. i'd buy this argument if actual kernel devs were complaining, not someone trying to build readership.