2 ms·
Good trick here. The article starts about how only 3.4% is spent on kernel development, which is a fair complaint. Then the author picks some other stuff total
by cool_dude85 5y ago
Good trick here.
The article starts about how only 3.4% is spent on kernel development, which is a fair complaint. Then the author picks some other stuff totally unrelated to the spending breakout to complain about, including diversity efforts, for which there are no spending breakouts.
Spending on these may be 1/100th of a percent for all we know, but the author claims at the end that despite not having spending breakdowns, that this is a fair description of the Linux Foundation, based on their annual report:
“The Linux Foundation is dedicated to social justice activism, climate change, and vaccine passports… while occasionally using Open Source software.”
- josteink 5y ago> Spending on these may be 1/100th of a percent for all we know Might be. But it still gets 5-10x more attention in the report itself which hints at the Linux Foundation’s priorities, and most likely spending. I say it’s a fair complaint.
- p_l 5y agoHave you considered that it might be at insistence of the major sponsors that should language is used in the report?