3 ms·
Depends on your definition of require. The flu doesn't require a vaccine, but if we had much higher vaccine uptake each year we would save hundreds of thousands
by pwthornton 5y ago
Depends on your definition of require. The flu doesn't require a vaccine, but if we had much higher vaccine uptake each year we would save hundreds of thousands of lives a year. It's possible that with really high vaccine uptake and other measures we could make the flu a lot more rare.
If we end up with a version of COVID that is less deadly and then we decide to not take vaccines seriously, we'll end up with endemic hundreds of thousands or millions of people dying every year. In the U.S., is an extra 100,000 dead a year something we should be OK with?
- hpoe 5y agoIf the choice is between that and permanent "emergency powers" for all levels of government to continue to panic and scare monger and implement things like vaccine passports, required immunizations as a condition of employment, the destruction of SMB and the demonization and hostility towards anyone that doesn't trust The Science (while shutting all discussion down about The Science because the plebs aren't smart enough to understand The Science) Then yes yes I will take that.
- jimmyearlcarter 5y agoYou know Covid-19, like the flu, is treatable right? https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/ https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/. Also in what universe does the flu kill hundreds of thousands of people?
- dang 5y agoWe've banned this account because (a) single purpose accounts aren't allowed here; (b) using HN primarily for ideological battle is not allowed here; (c) trollish usernames are not allowed here. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]