3 ms·
You are correct, HAVING is essentially syntax sugar. But to be fair, I'm glad it exists.
by FedericoRazzoli 5y ago
You are correct, HAVING is essentially syntax sugar. But to be fair, I'm glad it exists.
- tgv 5y agoSure, and I remember the version of mySQL that didn't have sub-queries. Having HAVING has your back, then.