> On a computing resource basis can you operate SQL Server on a rack in Equinix for cheaper than that in AWS? Sure, but who is going to pay for the person to pa

> On a computing resource basis can you operate SQL Server on a rack in Equinix for cheaper than that in AWS? Sure, but who is going to pay for the person to patch it every week, or upgrade it to the latest version, or upgrade the SAN disk, or upgrade the hardware every 3 years, etc. etc. Let's take this a step further - who is going to hire these people? And fire them? And train them? These are all transactions costs that get hidden in the "$0.20/hr cost" of spinning up an EC2 instance. Who cares? This is IT and is not relevant. And they have Brent and he will solve everything.