4 ms·
The implication from your comment is that vaccination is preventing lasting repercussions, but it isn't (only reduces some of it, and no one knows what the long
by headsoup 5y ago
The implication from your comment is that vaccination is preventing lasting repercussions, but it isn't (only reduces some of it, and no one knows what the long term vaccine repercussions are yet). So what was your point if not that?
- stavros 5y agoAll my comment said was "the relevant metric is lasting repercussions, not cases or anything else". I didn't say anything about vaccinations at all. Reading anything else into it is the reader's doing.
- headsoup 5y agoQuantify 'lasting repercussions.' What do you even mean here and how is it relevant if not in context of cases or 'anything else?'
- xboxnolifes 5y agoIt's dead simple. Nobody cares if you get sickness X, they care if you *die or have lasting major effects* due to sickness X. It doesn't matter whether sickness X is COVID, or the flu, or a cold, or literally anything else. If everyone gets some sickness, but nothing happens but a few symptoms for 24 hours, does it make a sound?
- headsoup 5y agoYeah, and my point is the vaccine doesn't prevent this, so what else are you referring to, preventatives?