> Not releasing the source code of IME gives Intel plausible deniability against allegations of intentionally inserting backdoors. Huh? One would think releasi

> Not releasing the source code of IME gives Intel plausible deniability against allegations of intentionally inserting backdoors. Huh? One would think releasing the source should give them much better plausible deniability. Like, they'd just have to go: "Look at the source. See? No backdoors in there!" > Especially for IME, which is much harder than regular software to extract and reverse engineer. Yeah, so people would be all "Just because I couldn't find it doesn't mean it isn't hidden in there somewhere." See? Not very plausible deniability at all.